Hi Brendan. I agree with you that this shooting incident is very strange and thank you for your research, it is very interesting. I just wanted to mention the possibility that Christopher Rodia was stopped for a motor vehicle issue unrelated to the school shooting. The radio tapes have cross traffic from units not at the school. Here is a link to a thread with this possible explanation:
http://getthetruthout.icyboards.net/showthread.php?tid=3408&pid=11741#pid11741

Hi Brendan! Let me start off by saying you have done an amazing and thorough job in reporting these consistencies and oddities. But I have a question myself that I have seen addressed by anyone. I would post references but am on my phone and can't do so. But I have seen a report (written from a news source tht was posted on fb along with a list of inconsistencies on the case) that reported the the little girl who's supposed father spoke at a conference (drawing ablank I the name, but it is the one there are tons of videos on saying he was acting and shows him laughing. Actually I believe u reported it) anywho, one report said they had recently moved from Utah and were having a viewing there a putting pink ribbons tht ought the city for their return to their "hometown" but in another video I was on Facebook from another news source said that the family had recently moved from New Mexico! They stated the school the little girl previously went to and even said they spoke to someone at the school who gave their condolences but could not say anything more of what they new abt the family and that crisis counselors would be in hand for students that knew her. So someone please tell me how this little girl and her family moved from two different towns at the same time? Or which is the truth. Or if this "family" even existed at all!

Hi Brendan! Let me start off by saying you have done an amazing and thorough job in reporting these consistencies and oddities. But I have a question myself that I have seen addressed by anyone. I would post references but am on my phone and can't do so. But I have seen a report (written from a news source tht was posted on fb along with a list of inconsistencies on the case) that reported the the little girl who's supposed father spoke at a conference (drawing ablank I the name, but it is the one there are tons of videos on saying he was acting and shows him laughing. Actually I believe u reported it) anywho, one report said they had recently moved from Utah and were having a viewing there a putting pink ribbons tht ought the city for their return to their "hometown" but in another video I was on Facebook from another news source said that the family had recently moved from New Mexico! They stated the school the little girl previously went to and even said they spoke to someone at the school who gave their condolences but could not say anything more of what they new abt the family and that crisis counselors would be in hand for students that knew her. So someone please tell me how this little girl and her family moved from two different towns at the same time? Or which is the truth. Or if this "family" even existed at all!

[These comments were posted under another topic, but more lilely belong here.]

Regarding the Chris Rodia references on the Police Radio ...

IMNSHO ... Chris Rodia is simply a victim of convergent simultaneous and unrelated events. He was just unlucky to be involved in an unrelated police action at the same moment that the arrival of police at Sandy Hook was taking place. Let me explain.

I listen to police radio for hours at a time virtually everyday. I am in an SF Bay Urban Area, and the local police department has more than 100 officers, dozens of which are 'on patrol' all the time. So, there is a continuous stream of police activity on the air. I use an App running on an Apple iPad, that allows me to listen to hundreds of police, fire and emergency units worldwide.

Many of them are small, some with only a handful of officers, so there is a lot of 'dead air' when the radio is quiet, as would likely have been the case in Newtown BEFORE the Sandy Hook shootings. In the SF Bay Area, there is very little dead air. The police radio system is like the old party telephone lines. Only ONE speaker can talk at a time. So you get a dispatcher and multiple officers on 2-way running commentary with ONLY one speaking at a time.

Just as in any day any place, that means there are always MULTIPLE cases 'in play' at any moment, all taking place over the same radio wavelength. Due to the large number of individual messages that must be passed in each direction, each comment is kept as short as humanly possible. Primarily using the familiar '10-code' vocabulary, where a single 4 or 5 digit code conveys all that is necessary ... e.g. 10-4 for understood, 10-8 for in service, 10-20 for location, 10-97 for arrived at scene, etc etc.

During a typical day of police transmissions, hundreds of cases develop, mostly 415 (disturbance), 5150 (crazy person), 459 (burglary), all conveyed using just those codes, but hundreds nonetheless. Traffic control, audible and silent alarm calls proliferate. Each message is preceded by the ID of the calling or receiving officer, and ended with confirmation from that officer by repeating the same code. That way every officer on patrol knows what message is for them, and which are for others. Surprisingly, it works very well.

Throughout the stream of criminal and investigation messages, there is a peppering of vehicle stops and registration checks, parking violations and handicap parking permit validations. EACH TIME an officer makes a stop or check, they report the license of the vehicle being stopped and their physical location (for safety). If they contact the driver, they will also transmit the drivers 'operator license' info for confirmation. All that info is broadcast over the radio, for the officers, and for the general public (with police scanners or the iPad App) to hear. I hear the vehicle description, license tag from the officer, and shortly followed by the dispatcher relating the license status, and the name of the registered owner/operator. They spell the name, and give info like birthdate, and description.

In a small jurisdiction like Newtown, there will be a lot of dead air, punctuated by typical traffic stops, like Mr. Rodia. His just happened to occur at the same time that the Sandy Hook tragedy was taking place. If the radio transmission recording was officially released by the police, they committed a grievous error by including the identification of Mr. Rodia as part of the Sandy Hook related transmissions. If the recording was created by a news agency or other third party, they are responsible for the error.

BUT .. THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO QUESTION IN MY MIND THAT IT IS AN ERROR. All the time and rhetoric expended trying to infer or connect Mr. Rodia to Sandy Hook ... is a HUGE waste of time and energy. And continual references to his police record and that of his family members is also a gross violation of his privacy and civil rights.

It would be like me writing down the name and other personal info I hear on the police radio, and connecting anyone with a police record (which is often mentioned by the dispatcher) to a recent burglar alarm call. I suspect that the static occuring before and after Mr. Rodia's name, is an attempt to block the identity of the officer making the stop. Probably as much for his safety as his privacy. In any case ... it is also possible that Mr. Rodia has been advised to let the media and bloggers banter his name about, hoping for someone to cross a 'right to privacy' line, providing him with basis for a lawsuit, so tread lightly.

Otherwise ... I liked your full 'movie', while a bit tedious and monotone, is still a nice collection of related conspiracy theories, and much of the 'fact' for anyone to interpret or research themselves. Good job.

The large-scale "terrorize the people" ploy has been going on for a
long time --take 9-11 as a case in point. The idea that "control is the
issue" does ring true, no argument there. But, like the 8000 page
Patriot Act that was slammed in front of congress hours after 9-11,
Feinstein just happened to have a weapons-ban bill conveniently-ready
just hours after Sandy Hook and she/it was hosted on every channel
decrying how imperative such a ban is to the fate of the country.

The subtitle to my webseries is "How Do Any of Us Know What's True
Anymore." So, IMHO, we need do not decide anything about the definitive
motivation behind these evens, but we do need to have the right in a
free country to ask questions and talk about this without being
railroaded as lunatics. So please keep talking.
Also, I think we should understand that the people behind these
concerted media messaging schemes --so uniformly deployed after these
events (every network using almost the same words!) are run by people
who are way ahead of us and have their controlled opposition responses
well in-place; controlled opposition IN ADDITION to the mainstream
media). We must therefore be suspect about 99% Occupy movement
"violence" or "lone gunman" or a media that has one lockstep voice
across all channels.

Noam Chomsky is another case in point--hard to believe because he is
considered "a radical" by the mainstream voice. But he is the PERFECT
controlled opposition voice. Go to educate-yourself.org (this is not my
site) and look up the research done on Chomsky's responses these many
years as our media and movies were being subverted. One of his on-video
quotes: "It doesnt matter even if there was a conspiracy behind 9-11."
Look it up yourself. Over time you can see that he decries "American"
and "Government" errors (big obvious ones) and then points us all
toward the globalization objective that WILL finally deccapitate us and
destroy American. He has NOTHING to say about predatory capitalism and the federal reaserve. See: http://educate-
yourself.org/cn/noamchomskygatekepper26sep05.shtml
Crazy. When our "radicals" are controlled opposition, the path ahead is
truly perilous. Go read the article and listen to Chomsky yourself and
you'll see! Same with Amy Goodman!

So be careful about deciding that SH may not be about disarming the
public. There is every reason to believe there are multiple
motivations. Plus, Cordia in SH may be just another layer of patsy or
distraction. Someone that stupid did not mastermind the SH event and
write the Parker/Soto/Rosen scripts.

This SH event was sloppy because there are much larger ploys afoot, and
most of the 300,000,000 in the US population at large are "accounted
for"--their minds are owned lock stock and barrell. And those steering
these events also own the voice that speaks to the churches and
foxnews' feardom, and evangelicals. [Evangelicals have a tremendous
history in this country of being easy to manipulate and made to vote
against their own interests. They've bought into the charade that their
overlords are honoring Jesus and Jerusalem and such. Most evangelicals
(huge percentage of this country) are good people who are simply being
played--and the more true they are in their devotion, the more
susceptible they are to the hoax against them.] And let's not forget
the liberals -- again--too easy to manipulate. They represent the more
educated percentage of the country but they are the most stupid of us
all. [Let's open our borders and then pay for all the cancer care the
illegal populace needs as a result of spraying and handling and
breathing the poisons and GMO pesticides our overlords insist we spray
on our crops but no one talks about. --Liberals are too kind!]

Let's face it: we all got duped. It is way too easy, now that ownership
of our media is a fait accompli, to derail legitimate questions about
Sandy Hook and other "events" as synonymous with the rantings of the
"lunatic fringe" or an "NRA with blood on its hands." Mostly, though,
our overlords dont care if truth is exposed (it's an irrelevancy now)
--people have chemtrails above their heads and dont even notice them!
If people knew that their kids are drinking GMO milk (BST) produced via
genetically modified e.coli bacteria (shit), they'd be like "ewww," but
it isnt even a secret --as long as we're all distracted and no one
looks it up, actual facts are irrelevant to the FDA and Monsanto and
our media overlords who are complicit in the intent to make us sick and
stupid (prozac, vaccines, flouride, gmo's, mad cow, antibiotic
resistance, estrogen mimicking compounds in everything we eat,
aspartame, and so on)! In the end, a damning fact or two about Adam
Lanza or Gene Rosen or a FB-Soto posting 4 days before the "event" isnt
really going to change the stranglehold they have on the minds of
hundreds of millions of Americans. LOL.

According to Kissinger--we are just a bunch

Hi there, after reading this amazing piece of writing i am too happy to share my knowledge here with colleagues.